PREMIERE MOBILE TEXT ALERTS
Receive a text alert every weekday with news coverage, DVD and film releases, and event information. More info.

Reviews Coming Soon DVD Reviews Features Daily News Forums Galleries Win

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« Meet Me In Cannes | Main | "Blueberry" Raspberry »

May 16, 2007

Comments

ed

yes, the "would-be profoundities" don't sound that swell in chinese either, but it's the sparkling personae and luscious star mystique that give them something extra. just like garbo making a world out of something as banal as "i want to be alone." the voice-over ramblings have to be taken in context of the concerto of images, sound, things left unsaid about character relationships etc. it sounds like MBN just didn't have all the waiter etiquettes, chef's little touches to bring that off.

mike

I've heard similar comments from others, and I can't help but chuckle to myself. If it is true that certain critics were only swallowing WKW's writing because it was a different language, then that's rather sad (and doesn't explain his success with critics who do speak his language. He's quite a hit in Hong Kong critics circles). It would certainly indicate intellectual laziness.

It's been apparent from the beginning tht Wong has a penchant for melodramatic dialogue. I think people were more accepting of it in Chungking Express and Fallen Angels because of the distinctly humorous tone of the films. The over-the-top dialogue fits in perfectly with cans of pineapple.

However, even his more "serious" works have featured melodramatic, idiosyncratic dialogue. And I truly think that it works. In fact, it might even be necessary. Wong has NEVER attempted to create a naturalistic or realistic atmosphere in his films. His films are pulled from human memory, where we tend to dramatize events, or idealize them. It's how nostalgia works (and nostalgia is the language of WKW). The profundity, as ed asserts, comes from his masterful pairings of his impeccable aural and visual elements, the dialogue is simply an atmospheric accoutrement. Melodramatic? Yes. But wholly appropriate given his mood pieces.

The comments to this entry are closed.